The letter cited the DA’s no-cash bail policy as the reason behind repeat robberies
Calling all Patriots!
‘Stay home and off the roads’
47% of Americans described themselves as Republicans or Republican-leaning
‘We dreamed of being pilots as boys but were told it was not possible’
‘It didn’t look good, it didn’t sound good’
By Neenah Payne
Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky) has been grilling Dr. Anthony Fauci since May 2020 about the role of his agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), in funding “gain of function” research at the Wuhan Lab in China that led to the creation of the SARS-COV-2 virus which is responsible for COVID-19. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NIAID did not fund gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. If Fauci lied before Congress, he is guilty of perjury which is punishable by a prison term of up to five years.
“Earlier this month, just hours after Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) dragged Anthony Fauci over pandemic misinformation — and the fact that Fauci’s NIH funded risky collaborations at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — the nation’s top virologist (and highest-paid government employee) furiously backpedaled over the origins of the pandemic in what we can only assume was an effort to redirect attention from his own culpability. Recall that since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, Fauci parroted CCP talking points — insisting that the virus couldn’t possibly have come from a Chinese lab.”
Whistleblower Confirms Fauci Funded COVID Virus
This Is Bigger Than The Pentagon Papers
Why Joe Rogan’s Interviews on Mass Psychosis “Broke The Internet” shows that Rogan’s three-hour interview with Dr. Robert Malone, founder of the mRNA technology, discussed the new concept of “mass psychosis”. That set the internet on fire. The article points out: “While Malone lost 512,000 followers on Twitter when they suspended his account, it’s rumored his interview with Rogan has garnered some 50 MILLION views across alternative free-speech platforms. “
Project Veritas Publishes Whistleblower’s Account
“Major development in the search for the origins of CV19, a Whistleblower has emerged and Fauci is in the spotlight!”
This video reports that on January 10, Project Veritas published a bombshell August 13, 2021 letter to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense from Major Joseph Murphy. He wrote, “When synthesized with the EcoHealth proposal, US collections confirm Eco Health Alliance was performing the work proposed”.
Murphy sheds light on Fauci’s COVID-19 gain of function program, concealment of documents, suppression of early treatments, the uselessness of masks, and why COVID vaccines are failing. Murphy pointed out, “The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is an engineered spike protein hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV2 quasispecies swarm.”
Murphy explained that the reason he knew something nefarious was going on was because of the government’s “massive Manhattan Project level of information suppression” which was executed with the help of its willing accomplices in the media through the “Trusted News Initiative”. “The lab-leak hypothesis and squabbling between Senator Paul and Dr. Fauci suggested that the cover-up was more localized,” he wrote. Suspecting that the paperwork would be well hidden, Murphy said he presumed that classified files would be concealed on a higher network, and found them where I expect them to be. “I understood what they were, and their content pushed the files off-site, and compiled this report”.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022
“Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive. DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
The report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium. According to the documents, NAIAD, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.
Dr. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. But according to the documents obtained by Project Veritas which outline why EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal was rejected, DARPA certainly classified the research as gain of function. “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
Major Murphy’s report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines. Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were shrouded in secrecy. “If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked,” Adams said. “I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space, no.”
In a video breaking this story published on Monday night, Project Veritas CEO, James O’Keefe, asked a foundational question to DARPA: “Who at DARPA made the decision to bury the original report? They could have raised red flags to the Pentagon, the White House, or Congress, which may have prevented this entire pandemic that has led to the deaths of 5.4 million people worldwide and caused much pain and suffering to many millions more.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci has not yet responded to a request for comment on this story.”
READ THE DOCUMENTS:
DRASTIC Summary of EcoHealth’s DEFUSE Grant Proposal
EcoHealth Alliance Executive Summary of DEFUSE
EcoHealth’s full DEFUSE grant proposal to DARPA
DARPA agency PREEMPT project grant solicitation announcement
US Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy’s Analysis Report to Inspector General of DOD and internal Marine Corps email
Congress Demands Answers From CDC, Defense, and HHS
“Members of both chambers of Congress have sent scathing letters to government officials seeking answers in the aftermath of military documents uncovered by Project Veritas which revealed a proposal from EcoHealth Alliance to research bat-borne coronaviruses that was rejected by DARPA and a potential cover-up of those documents. Madison Cawthorn, Bill Posey, Diana Harshbarger, Lisa McClain, Randy Weber, and Matt Gaetz sent letters to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and HHS Secretary Beccerra asking them to confirm if the explosive documents were indeed “hidden in a top-secret share drive.”
The letter from members of Congress comes on the heels of a similar inquiry made by Senator Ron Johnson: “On January 10, 2022, Project Veritas published an August 2021 disclosure from U.S. Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy concerning the origins of COVID-19. According to the document, Major Murphy sent the disclosure to the Department of Defense (DoD) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for investigation. It is my understanding that the disclosure was subsequently referred by the DoD OIG to the DoD’s Research and Engineering office for further investigation.
According to the Major’s disclosure, EcoHealth Alliance (EcoHealth), in conjunction with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), submitted a proposal in March 2018 to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) regarding SARS-CoVs. The proposal included a program, called DEFUSE, that sought to use a novel chimeric SARS-CoV spike protein to inoculate bats against SARS-CoVs.
Although DARPA rejected the proposal, the disclosure alleges that EcoHealth ultimately carried out the DEFUSE proposal until April 2020 through the National Institutes of Health and National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The disclosure highlights several potential treatments, such as ivermectin, and specifically alleges that the EcoHealth DEFUSE proposal identified chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloriquine) and interferon as SARS-CoV inhibitors.
Johnson went on to cite Project Veritas’ report while setting a January 25th deadline for the recipients of the letter to respond to the following questions:
Did the office of Research and Engineering receive a copy of the enclosed disclosure from the DoD OIG? If so, please provide the date it received the complaint.
Has the office of Research and Engineering or another DoD component initiated an investigation of the allegations in the disclosure? If so, explain what investigative steps have been taken thus far. If not, please explain why not.
Has the office of Research and Engineering or another DoD component interviewed or spoken with the U.S. Marine Corps Major who drafted the disclosure? If so, when? If not, please explain why not.
Does DoD intend to create a written investigate report or any other document based on its investigation of allegations contained in the disclosure? If so, please provide a copy of those documents. If not, please explain why not.
Senator Johnson went on to request a briefing on the findings of any investigation into documents obtained by Project Veritas while requesting to speak with U.S. Marine Corps Major, Joseph Murphy, to discuss his disclosure as soon as possible.”
On January 11, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sent a letter to Department of Defense (DOD) Secretary Lloyd Austin and Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering Heidi Shyu demanding information on an August 2021 disclosure from U.S. Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy.
COVID-19: Man-Made Bioweapon?
The Definition of a Bioweapon shows that when Senator Rand Paul (KY) asked Dr. Fauci whether the NIAID or NIH had funded the “gain of function” research at the Wuhan Lab in China, Fauci denied any involvement. However, Dr. Richard Fleming said on the show that Fauci perjured himself and explained how NIH and NIAID support dangerous “gain of function” research.
Dr. Fleming showed the patent for gain of function research for coronavirus funded by the NIH. He said everyone involved should be held accountable in international courts in a Nuremburg Trial for crimes against humanity. Dr. Fleming pointed out,
“Either this country is going to be held accountable by the rest of the world or the people who bypassed the safe guards like Fauci, Cowan, and the Department of Defense who gave money to Peter Daszak who gave it to Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli — either we’re going to be held accountable or the people who actually did this are going to be held accountable.”
Dr. Fleming explained,
“This virus is a man-made gain-of-function virus paid for by US taxpayers’ dollars including moneys that came from the Department of Defense. This is a bioweapon by every definition — and by every definition, their having developed this, it is a violation of the Biological Weapons Conventions Treaty. This vaccine rollout is largest research project conducted in the history of mankind.”
Dr. David Martin Exposes COVID Mass Murder Plot
Dr. Martin cites the February 2020 quote by veterinarian Peter Daszak shown below.
COVID Treatments Denied To Public
Dr. Joseph Mercola’s article on January 16 “The Plan to Tag Us for the New World Order Slave System” (deleted in 48 hours) links to a video interview with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko. The article explains:
“Back in March 2020, Dr. Zelenko saw a MedCram video, episode 34. Seheult quoted a paper that explained the functioning of zinc ionophores. That mechanism is what Zelenko relied upon when developing his own protocol.
However, he didn’t realize until December 2021 that the author of that paper was Dr. Ralph Baric. Why does that matter?
Zelenko explains: ‘In 1999, Ralph Baric…funded by the National Institutes of Health, figured out how to make a corona bat virus infect human beings, and augmented its lethality. But in 2010, Baric published that paper that I’m referring to. So, The same people that made the bomb… created the antidote. And then, when the pandemic arrived, doctors like myself, out of necessity, came up with creative solutions, based — in my case, unknowingly — on this work. And immediately, that information was marginalized and suppressed, and doctors were deplatformed for advocating for it.
So, the government who made the bomb also knew about the solution. And the reason why is they didn’t want to die. The stakeholders here don’t want their families to die. But for you and for me, they have a different agenda. So, they had that information. I have knowledge that the Google executives are all taking hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for prophylaxis, as is half of Congress. And so, the people that have orchestrated this knew the answer, and use it for themselves. Even doctors know the answer for themselves. They prescribe [these drugs] for themselves, or they call me. But when patients come, they say there’s no treatment, go home, take Tylenol. So, this is mass murder.’”
Did 2019 Financial Crisis Drive COVID Policy?
COVID Premeditated Mass Murder Case Against Big Pharma links to the video Pandemic Simulations: Preparing For a New Era? by the German journalist Paul Schreyer on November 20, 2020.
Schreyer shows that from September 16-17 2019, the interest rate at which banks borrow money short term shot from 2% to 10% — and banks were afraid they were going to run out of money! The world financial system was close to collapse which was as serious as the Great Depression. He thinks this may explain why Event 201 took place in October 2019 and the “pandemic” started in early 2020.
“Finally, after a handful of organizations tried suing Dr. Anthony Fauci in order to have them released, the good doctor’s financials – along with those of his wife, who is the NIH’s top bioethicist – have been disclosed in detail. The records…showed the Faucis have a combined net worth of more than $10MM.“
Neenah Payne writes for Activist Post and Natural Blaze
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
Over the past year, the Federal Reserve Note “dollar” has been losing value at an alarming pace as reflected by broad price level increases.
Last week’s Consumer Price Index and Producer Price Index reports put those measures of inflation at 7.0% and 9.7%, respectively.
Manufacturers had to bear the brunt of the inflation surge in 2021.
The worst may be yet to come for consumers as producers pass on their costs to wholesalers and retailers.
Some politicians, such as Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and others whose policy preferences are largely responsible for the inflation problem, have now taken to inflation demagoguery – crusading against producers for raising prices while peddling conspiracy theories about “price gouging” and collusion.
Other supporters of President Joe Biden, concerned about his plummeting job approval numbers, are trying to downplay inflation.
Republicans, of course, are trying to exploit “Bidenflation” as a winning political issue heading into this fall’s election. They note that American families will have to pay an additional $3,500 on average just to maintain their standard of living in 2022.
Hardly anyone in Washington wants to talk about the real elephant in the room, though. The Federal Reserve’s easy money policies combined with massive handouts and fiscal spending – the primary drivers of inflation – have been championed by both Republicans and Democrats.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell was appointed and confirmed by Republicans. He has now been reappointed by a Democrat. He will soon probably be confirmed for another term with bipartisan support in the Senate.
Consumers and investors should therefore expect more of the same.
Although the Fed intends to push up interest rates, likely beginning in March with a quarter-point baby step, it is way behind the curve. The central bank would have to impose a massive series of hikes starting immediately in order to have any hope of getting out in front of rising price levels this year.
That isn’t going to happen. The powers that be in Washington and on Wall Street wouldn’t stand for it.
The currency will continue to lose value. The only question is how rapidly.
America’s fiat currency lost purchasing power last year at its steepest pace in 40 years.
Yet over that same period, the U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the currency against a basket of foreign currencies, actually gained value.
This anomalous dollar “strength” was caused by competitors such as the euro losing value even more rapidly.
Although gold is not a component of the Dollar Index, it does often behave as a currency. It is, after all, sound money – sought by individuals for wealth protection and even central banks as backing in reserves.
In the paper markets, traders may hastily hit the “sell” button on gold and silver when they see the U.S. Dollar Index strengthening. That’s one big reason why precious metals underperformed last year.
For the same reason, though, gold and silver could get a boost in 2022 if the Dollar Index begins to trend lower along with the value of the currency itself.
The Dollar Index dropped last week.
More significantly, it appears to have breached an uptrend line that had been in force since last June.
Dollar bears will be looking for confirmation of a breakdown in this week’s trading with any additional move lower. It could just be the catalyst gold and silver markets need to break out to the upside.
Stefan Gleason is President of Money Metals Exchange, the company recently named “Best Overall Online Precious Metals Dealer” by Investopedia. A graduate of the University of Florida, Gleason is a seasoned business leader, investor, political strategist, and grassroots activist. Gleason has frequently appeared on national television networks such as CNN, FoxNews, and CNBC and in hundreds of publications such as the Wall Street Journal, TheStreet, and Seeking Alpha.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
By Brad Polumbo
The federal government has spent an astounding $42,000 per federal taxpayer on so-called “stimulus” efforts since the pandemic began. Where did all that money go? Well, as it turns out, one of the biggest stimulus programs, the Paycheck Protection Program, failed miserably.
At least, that’s the finding of a new study from MIT economist David Autor and nine coauthors. They examined the $800 billion Paycheck Protection Program, which gave “loans,” most of which won’t have to be paid back, to businesses. It was created by Republicans and Democrats in Congress alike in hopes of helping businesses preserve their employees’ jobs for the duration of the COVID-19 crisis.
The study tracks the money to see where it ended up and what it achieved. The results… aren’t pretty.
The analysis shows that even though 93 percent of small businesses received loans from the program, only between 2-3 million jobs were preserved. The program spent an astounding $170,000-$257,000 for each job it helped preserve! That’s, erm, a lot more than most of those jobs even pay.
Moreover, the study finds that only 23 to 34 percent of the program’s dollars went to workers who would’ve otherwise lost their jobs—meaning the vast majority went to “business owners and shareholders.” (Oh, and a whole bunch was lost to fraud, too).
The authors conclude that the program’s benefits were “highly regressive,” meaning it benefited the wealthy more, with about 75 percent of the benefits flowing to the top 20 percent of earners.
Does all this sound like an effective use of $800 billion in taxpayer money?
Some might be tempted to focus on the positives, and note that the program did help some people. But we cannot evaluate government policies without considering the opportunity cost, the trade-offs. What could private individuals have done with that $800 billion? After all, every dollar the government spends must, directly or indirectly, come from taxpayers.
Between donating to private charity and investing in private businesses and jobs, it’s hard to imagine a scenario where that money doesn’t create more jobs and wealth if left in private hands. But then politicians wouldn’t have a shiny “stimulus” program to point to as an “accomplishment” on the campaign trail.
It’s sad, but not very surprising, that political expediency trumped economic efficiency in such a major federal spending program.
Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.
Provide, Protect and Profit from what’s coming! Get a free issue of Counter Markets today.
This never gets old.
President Trump ripped MSDNC, Joe Scarborough, his sidekick Mika, and “racist” Joy Reid in an epic statement on Monday morning.
Via Liz Harrington.
President Donald J .Trump:
“Will Morning Joe be canceled? He and Mika’s ratings are very low—they are having an extremely hard time finding an audience to listen to the Fake News they spurn. Losing them would be very sad—hope it doesn’t happen! On another front, looks like Unjoy Reid, the racist commentator on MSDNC (MSNBC), is toast. Her stupidity is only surpassed by her absolute lack of television persona. She never had it, and never will. The only thing she’s good at is spewing racist hate but obviously, no one is listening!”